Comments for August 8th - 15th
From: Robert S Shuttles
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF ANY OVERLAY PROGRAM FOR AREA CODES.
NO WAY TO THE OVERLAY
From: H Tran
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I prefer a geographic split, with Albuquerque/Santa Fe in (505) and Eastern
NM in (575).
Second choice is an overlay plan.
From: joe slagle
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
The Geographic split is the only logical solution. The overlay makes absolutely no sense.
From: Patricia French
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I say NO to the overlay and yes to the geographic split option for the area code change. Who wants to dial 10 digits for a local number.
From: Martha Whitman
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I am an Albuquerque resident and business owner, and I ask the PRC to adopt the geographic split option. It is the right thing to do.
From: Suzan Wood
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I feel the best option is the geographic split. The overlay option is too confusing and will continue to cause confusion after implemented.
From: David Lowe
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
No matter how you proceed problems will be caused to some. Shorterm, overlay sounds like the best solution but not well thought out for the future. 2 ditricts with different area codes should be formed. Since more government is located in the valley sector this should stay the same to avoid major tax payer expense.
From: Martin Zimbeoff
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Keep Albuquerque as 505
From: Marcia Brooks
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Please vote for the geographic split option and NOT the overlay option on the NM area code relief issue.
From: Jim Mize
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I am against the Overlay plan and favor the Geographic Split. I have two cell phones, two telephone lines of which one is used for a high speed internet connection and a fax, and an alarm system, all of which would have to be reprogrammed under the Overlay plan. This would involve considerable effort and costs. NO WAY to Overlay!
From: Marlene Chase
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments: It's bad enough to add another area code. The geographic split
seems to make
more sense than the overlay which should
NOT be an option.
From: Mary Lee Moeny
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Overlay plan - NO!!
From: Henry L Bretton
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
As Seniors my wife (81 yrs) and I (90yrs)are strongly opposed to the proposed "overlay." We favor the Geographic Split as we will find the burden of conversion of all of our papers, checkbooks, trusts, etc etc simply too much. Respectfully H.L.Bretton and Marian M Bretton
From: Jacqui Cross
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I believe it would be in the best interest of everyone in New Mexico to adopt the geographic split option. We are all going to have to come into the 21st century and accept a change of some sort. Let's just bite the bullet and get it over with. Using the over lay option is way too complicated and confusing.
From: Kent Mathis
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
New Mexico should NOT institute the overlay system for the new area code. A geographic split makes far more sense in the daily lives of all New Mexicans, in terms of cost, convenience, and numbers of citizens affected. Please use some common sense in making this decision. NO WAY TO THE OVERLAY!!!!!
From: Kara Gillon
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I strongly recommend that New Mexico and the PRC follow the lead of other
states and adopt the geographical split option of 505/575. This
option simply makes more sense for those calling from out-of-state and
are confused by two area codes for the entire state, regardless of location;
for those in-state who could have different area codes in the same home
or business; and for two-thirds of those in-state who will have less work
because of this decision.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
From: C. Earl Greer
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I understand there are approximately 7 million numbers available in an
area code and that we are only using in the neighborhood of 2 million.
1) Are my figures correct?
2) If so, why are we looking at adding a new area code; it is a costly
agenda!
3) If my figures are not correct, what are the correct figures? Why have
they not been shared with the general public? If they have, why do you
suppose the media has not forwarded the data to the public?
4) I have not seen where a study has been done to determine the impact
cell phones have had on the area code issue. What is that impact?
5) Why are you "rushing" this issue through? Why not wait until
2007 when there will be 3 newly elected commissioners?
Please advise.
Thank you for your attention to my comments.
From: Bert U. Eriksson
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Geographical Split Option is the least confusing
So......
I ABSOLUTELY DO NOT WANT THE OVERLAY OPTION FOR THE NEW 575 AREA CODE.
Another Option is Cell Phones Area 575
The rest 505
From: Paul Brooks
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Assign area code 575 to cell phones and area code 505 to land lines.
From: Jim Maddox
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Whith all the cell phones in use why are celll phone area codes not being considered as the change instead of business and residential and splitting the state? Seriously this should be looked at in more detail! Much less costly for the consumer.
From: Bob
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Why not use 575 for cell phones and leave the land based phones as they are?
From: Cindy Rondeau
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
The overlay option is a bad idea. Bad for children who need to contact
their parents and the elderly who need to contact family.
The Geographic split option makes much more sense! As Albuquerque
metro grows it is only reasonable to add more area codes to the state.
But not to place a burden on all who live in the state!
From: Jon Arndt
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I favor the overlay option. Although dialing a 10 digit number for all calls is tedious, I believe it is superior to forcing some business and consumers to change phone numbers.
From: Bertha Baca
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I think that all cell phone numbers should be issued the new 575 and all land lines should keep the 505.
From: Susan H
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I believe we need the geographic split. Having to dial an area code for someone across the street would be ridiculous. The area that retains the 505 code should be the area with the highest concentration of businesses that use letterhead stationery and business cards and other printed materials that would be expensive to replace. That would reduce the overall economic burden on the state as a whole.
From: Stephanie
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
why can't they just say after such-n-such a date, all new issued numbers will have the new area code?
From: Robert Potts
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
The best solution is not the one being offered. Make all land lines
505 and all cell phones 575. The reason we need another area code
in this state is because of the explosion of cell phone use. So,
make the culprit bear the onus of change!
It's also very practical in that statewide almost everyone who has a legitamite
need to keep 505 will be able to keep it. And you will always know
whether you are dialing a cell or a land line in NM.
If you do the math you will see that this solution allows plenty of numbers
for cell phones in 575 area code, and plenty of numbers for land lines
in 505 area code.
Problem solved!
Only problem, no one has ever done it this way in the US.
Let's try a little innovation for once!
From: Dennis C. Wilson
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I have reviewed the two options and feel that the overlay option is not acceptable! The only way (I feel) to implement this plan is to implement the GEOGRAPHIC SPLIT OPTION. Additionally, I am not very pleased that you have made it so hard for people to get their comments heard.
From: Tom Heilpern
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
The city and surrouding are of Portland Ore has about 1.7 million people
in one area code. There is no talk of sub-dividing that code
number.
Quest is not giving the PRC the honest answers to your questions.
Is it the first time?
From: Janet Simon
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
The geopgraphic split option has far fewer negatives than the Overlay option. I encourage the PRC to decide in favor of the geographic split option.
From: Barbara Weissenborn
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
My husband, Ron, and I are against the Overlay option and FOR the Geographic Split option regarding the new area code, 575. Please consider our comments when voting on the area code relief. Also, the neighbors I have spoken with feel the same.
From: River of Life Foursquare Gospel Church
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
We are against the Overlay Option in the NM area code relief issue
From: Willie & Lori Sisneros
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Please vote NO to the Overlay Option on the NM Area Code Relief Issue. There are too many disadvantages to the overlay Option. The Geographic Split Option is much better & less confusing. SAY NO WAY TO THE OVERLAY!!!!
From: Rudy & Gina Sisneros
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Please vote NO to the Overlay Option on the NM Area Code
Relief Issue. We say "NO WAY" to the Overlay!! It is just too
confusing. The Geographic Split Option makes better sense. Thanks
From: Amalie Frischknecht
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I would much prefer the geographic split option to the 575 area code, even if it meant I had to change my own area code (I live in Albuquerque). It would be a real nuisance and confusion to have different area codes in the same geographic area.
From: Robert Harris
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Please note I am against using the overlay system here in NM. Please make it easier on all of us and split the state into to two seperate area codes. I don't care if Rio Rancho keeps the old area code or gets a new one. Just do not use the overlay approach.
From: David
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I prefer the geographic split option
From: simon doering
Date: August 12, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I think we should change it only if we have too. Are we running out of numbers? If not, we're kinda known as the "505", why mess with it.
From: ervin
Date: August 12, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
keep major populated areas with the 505 and the rest of the state gets new. Just like Arizona, Colorado, Utah, Idaho, Washington, etc. Use what has worked, no need to reinvent the wheel.
From: Ruth Milner
Date: August 12, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Please stick with the normal geographic split. It's a clear-cut division,
easy for everyone calling NM numbers to figure out, and a simple one-time
conversion for those who have to. My former employer went through it with
two of their four locations in the past 15 years; this would be the third.
There's a lengthy period when calls are redirected if the old area code
is used. It just isn't a big deal, for businesses or anyone else.
The overlay option, by contrast, would result in far more confusion for
all concerned, and that confusion would last indefinitely. "Yes,
my business had to add a second line, but it's 575 even though our original
number is 505." What a nightmare, for years to come.
I don't understand why this has generated so much agonizing. It's been
done before; is New Mexico really going to be the first place where people
can't handle this? How silly.
Oh, and for the record, I live in a town that would have to change its
area code if 505 stays with ABQ and/or Santa Fe.
From: K. Moran
Date: August 12, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I am of the opinion that new phone numbers should receive the 575 area
code. Such a course of action avoids the problem of dividing the
state and figuring out on whom to place the burden and cost of changing
all information that includes the current 505 area code.
Having lived in Los Angeles for 12 years where ten digit dialing was a
fact of life to call only a few miles away, this burden is relatively
minor, especially when so many people use/keep cell phones with area codes
other than 505. We are already dialing 10 digits for lots of calls.
From: Kay McGhee
Date: August 12, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I am adamantly opposed to the overlay option for the new area code in NM. I believe the geographic split would be the most efficient, reasonable and financially prudent for the citizens of this State. The majority of other states having this option have chosen the geographic split. The geographic split is favored by the majority of NM citizens. Please do what is right by the people of NM!
From: Kathleen V. Ward
Date: August 11, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
No way to the overlay
From: Jerry E. Zimmerman
Date: August 11, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
No way to the overlay bad idea..
From: Debbie Winchell
Date: August 11, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
No Way to the Overlay!!!!!! The geographic split makes a lot more sense.
From: Kim Slagle
Date: August 11, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
The Geographic Split Option is the COMMON SENSE option. The Overlay Option would be very confusing and expensive for all New Mexicans and have a negative impact on ecomonic development. Please vote for the GEOGRAPHIC SPLIT OPTION. Thank you.
From: Jarrod Cline
Date: August 11, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I would prefer the geographic split option.
From: James Messec
Date: August 11, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Both as a private citizen and as a small business owner I strongly object to the Overlay concept. I much prefer the geographic concept. EVEN IF IT MEANS MY BUSINESS AND RESIDENCE WIND UP IN THE NEW AREA CODE.
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Keep 505 for landlines and use 575 for cell phones.
From: Mike Sare
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
1) I suggest shifting the area code for NM cel phones to 575 in order
to free 505 number blocks. This interim step could postpone future
landline area code split and provide more time for more of the population
to internalize the need for change due population growth. The "Land
of Enchantment" is becoming the "Land of Promise."
2) If geographic split is implemented, suggest Santa Fe / Albuquerque
area be maintained 505. Seat of government and adjunct major supporting
activities would be stabilized, and this would likely minimize the economic
impact on a majority of New Mexico businesses as well. View eventual
split as inevitable due to population growth. Folks will just have
to get used to dialing area code + number. (I remember as a young
man when Chicago had to go through this; people got over it in a very
short time).
Hope this is helpful. Thank you for the opportunity to submit ideas.
From: Loretta Gorman
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I would prefer the geographic split. At my previous residence in IL. I WENT THROUGH 3 AREA CODE CHANGES All were geographic changes.
From: Jeremie Sare
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Rather than thinking geographically, think about functionality. Keep land lines as 505 and change all cellular phones (current and new) to the new area code, since cell phones are not necessarily linked to a specific geographic location and there would be fewer phone books, yellow pages, websites, ads, etc. to correct.(I'm assuming most cell phones are not listed in a directory or used as primary business phones). This would lessen the impact and confusion, while maintaining stability for the current businesses, govt. numbers and established residents. Less confusion with regard to who has which number. Rather than having to figure out whether a town/city is 505 or 575, we'd just know that all fixed (land line)phones are same as before and all cell phones are the new (575).
From: Kent Krepps
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Geographic option, anything else is chaos
From: robert dai zovi
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Keep alb. & Sante Fe at 505
From: Barb D
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I support the assignment of 575 to cell phones. The cost of changing business numbers is too costly to make them change from 505. Cell phones tend to be more personal and the change would create less hassle and cost.
From: Kim Birdsall
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Firstly, I would like more information on why this is necessary. It will create an undue expense to many and should not be implemented unless absolutely necessary. Secondly, I feel if a split is necessary, it should segregate cell phones from land line phones.
From: AG Meeks
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
My vote: Avoid 10-digit dialing.
From: Joseph Marino
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Overlay too cumbersome, especially with 10 digit dialing and then specifically having to know the area code vice no-brainer geographic distinction; geographic less confusing and incurs only a one-time cost and with sufficient lead time will be reasonable. Cell phones with new 575 and landlines with 505 another potential alternative which would also enable knowing what you're dialing to.
From: K & L Cleaning Specialists
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
575 should be a geographic split. Using an overlay will create confusion for clients looking for a spacific company. If the information from the PRC is correct, 1 business could have multiple lines that have the 2 area codes. A geographic split will inconvience a smaller group of telephone clients.
From: Tadd Johnson
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Give the new 575 area code to cell phones. They are mobile, seldom published and are the cause of the need for an additional area code in the first place. 575 would identify a cell phone number and EVERYBODY in the state would be happy. Is that so wrong?
From: John Dooley
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Since the cell phones are adding to our problem it would make sense to make all cell phones change to 575 and all land lines use the 505. This would affect the least business.
From: Ken Shapiro
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Lets keep the split to geographic. In theory if we do an overlay I could have 2 cell phones with different area codes along with my house line and office line with different codes. Than I would have to dile 10 digits to connect. Wake up an make the choice that will be easier on the consumer.
From: Claudia Childress
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I believe that the geographic split option will be the least disruptive and the least complicated.
From: Dolores Paskiewicz
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I very definitely feel the new area code needs to be implemented by geographc split.
From: Francis Harding
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I am a small business owner in Albuquerque. I would strongly prefer to
avoid the expense that would accompany the adoption of the "Overlay
Option".
I vote Geographical Split Option.
From: William/Lillian Kroenke
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
From the perspective of the majority of Nm businesses, both large and small, as well as avoiding a negative impact on the NM economy in general, we strongly encourage the PRC to adopt the Geographic Split Option.
From: Geneva Causey
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I do believe that the overlay option that you plan to pass is a bad idea. Having to remember what area code to use depending on who I am calling although that person my live across the street from me I feel is going to be some-what difficult. Not to mention; has anyone thought about our seniors and this OVERLAY OPTION is going to affect them? I do believe that this is a bas idea for New Mexico due to we have always had one area code and now you want us to have to remember what area code we will need to use to call the person accross the street from us. It will be easier if they did the change according to geographic. Thank you for allowing me to voice my comments.
From: Don Wilwson
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
DO NOT, I repeat, do not go to the overlay plan. Be like the majordity of the rest of the contry and use the geographical split method.
From: Eddie Justus
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
It only makes sense to split the codes geographicaly. One code for the largest population area (Bernalillo County) and one for the rest of the state.
From: Zach Weiss
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I believe that the state should be split geographicly in accomidating this new 575 area code. Although it might be a bit of hastle initally changing around the existing 505 area code, i believe a geographic split of the state will make the two area codes easier to manage and categorize. An overlay of the two area codes will cause confusion, expecially in the cities. People will likely become frustrated with having to dial an area code number much of the time. It will be confusing not knowing what numbers go with which area code. Splitting the state into two regions is much simpler for the citizens to deal with. A geographic split of the state will allow accomidating a second area code in New Mexico much easier in the long run. Thank You.
From: Thomas J Hill
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
As a small business owner I prefer the Geographic Split
From: Judith Craig
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I would like to see a geographic split. It would affect my small business to have to relay information to everyone that they must now dial the 505 first.
From: Jackie Sexton
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I would like to vote for the geographic split option regarding the NM area code relief issue. It makes so much more sense to allow most of the population to make a normal 7 digit local call, and to split the area code the way Colorado handled their similar situation.
From: Randal Totten
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Suggest the ABQ metro area (Rio Rancho, Los Lunas) keep 505 and the rest of NM use 575.
From: Bert Beaton
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Having gone through this process in both the San Francisco Bay Area and again (twice) in Atlanta, the easier transistion, by far, would be the geographic one, in my opinion. In a state the size of NM, the geographic split just seems to make the most sense. Plus, having 10 digit dialing is a huge inconvience that should be avoided if possible. Thanks.
From: Paul
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I am concerned about the Overlay plan being considered by the PRC.
I believe this plan would be more costly to New Mexico citizens than the
Geographic split for the following reasons:
I think the 10 digit dialing for local calls is confusing and time consuming
(especially when driving). I understand that it is inevitable for
other States, but we have a choice in New Mexico and we choose 7 digit
local dialing for the next 20 years.
From: sally neilson
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Since Santa Fe is the capitol of New Mexico it seems only reasonable that it should remain in the 505 area code. The cost of printing and changing of all the necessary business documents would more than override the sense of changing into a new area code. Albuquerque would have the same problem since it is the largest city in the state. Keep the 505 area code for Northern New Mexico and change the southern part of the state to the 575...
From: Jackie Von Loh
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I strongly prefer the geographic split rather than the overlay plan. The time associated with verifying the area code and dialing 10 digits will have a much larger cost (measured in lower worker productivity) than the one time cost for businesses to change their advertising and promotional materials. The Overlay plan would be way too confusing for years to come. The geographic change will be difficult at first, but will quickly become the norm. Suggestion would be to go ahead and make 3 area codes now if it looks like it will be needed anytime in the next 20 years. Let's do it right way -- not just the easiest way.
From: Derek Fuentes
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I do not see the need for us to re-invent the wheel. I lived previously in the state of Colorado, and they moved several years ago from 303 statewide to 303 and 719. Since then, more area codes have been formed, but during the initial phase, the debate on how to separate area codes ensued. In the end, the state was divided so that the southeastern part of the state received the new 719 area code and 303 remained in the north and west. Now, of course, 303 only applies to Denver because of the growth in population. I propose we adopt a similar tactic to prepare for our inevitable growth, as well. We may one day find ourselves in a situation like Colorado where our beloved 505 ends up in a small part of the state. Thank you for your consideration.
From: Nick
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I've lived in locations where an overlay was instituted and where a geographical split was used. I much PREPFER A GEOGRAPHICAL SPLIT even though I was in the area that changed area codes.
From: Joseph J. Buday
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I want the 7 digit number not the 10 digit number. Divide the state into two. By the way, why can't we be a little more forward thinking? If we're going to add 1 number good for only 22-30 years, why not add a few numbers and divide up the state a little more, spread the pain around and be prepared for the next 50-75 years? Will technology take us past an area code?
From: Anthony G Carmody
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
No to the overlay.
From: Jill Cast
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I DEFINATELY DO NOT WANT THE OVERLAY OPTION. tHE MAJORITY OF BUSINESSES ARE IN THE GEOGRAPHIC CITY LISTED AND THE COST & TIME WASTED HAVING TO DIAL 10 NUMBERS EVERY TIME I HAVE TO MAKE A CALL IS ALSO COSTLEY.
From: george m. richmond
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Most of the commerce/legal activities in New Mexico cover the I-25 corridor
from Santa Fe, including Los Alamos county, south, through Albuquerque
to Las Cruces.
so,I feel that the above area should keep the 505 area code, and that
the rest of NM switch to 575.
The thought of layering a new area code so that everyone has to dial 11
digits, o + area code + the number, just makes no sense.
Most metro areas, NY, Chicago, etc, have added new codes, so why not NM?
From: Carlye Warner
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
why not let Albuquerque and surrounding areas keep the 505 area code. We contribute the most business state wide and are the largest city. It would be a higher cost for businesses to change area codes than resendential areas. All other areas switch to the 575 to keep the majority of the population happy.
From: Blythe Wood
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I am very strongly in favor of a geographic split for the addition of the new 575 area code. The need to call 10 digits for every phone call will be extremely annoying. Everyone will need to remember who has the 505 and who has the 575, even if you live next door. ALL phones will need to be reprogrammed to auto dial the extra digits. I am not just saying this to avoid the personal inconvenience of a one time change for my area code. I do not care if my area code changes to 575. Those who want an overlay must not understand the pain of adding 3 digits to every phone number. It will be very hard to remember this minor difference for each and every phone number. In addition the 505 and 575 prefixes sharing the last seven conventional digits will probably get a lot of wrong numbers. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE use the geographic split. The long term impact will be much less painful!
From: t
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I prefer the geographic split that retains the 505 area code for the large population centers of Albuquerque and Santa Fe.
From: Jay Weingardt
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
The geographic split clearly make the best sense and causes the fewest RECURRUNG problems. It will be unfortunate, expensive and inconvenient for those who have to change, but some expense and inconvenience is inevitable. Since Albuquerque is the economic engin that powers the state, disruptions here would cost the most revenue loss to the state. Therfore, ALbuquerque should retain the 505 area code. Perhaps those that keep the 505 should pay an additional $5.00 per line/month for one or two years, and those changing to 575 can have a rebate of $5.00 per line/month to help offset some of the costs of the change. This spreads the pain a little more evenly.
From: Kevin J. McCarty
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I'd never heard of an 'overlay' until this started to appear in the media. The normal way of adding an area code is with a geographic split. That's what they did with Dallas and north TX back in the 80's. Dallas got 214 and N TX got the new 903. Worked great. I don't care if you give the 505 to ABQ or the 575, but since ABQ is more populated and probably has more businesses I'd think the overall costs for the changeover (companies having to reprint letterhead, business cards, etc) would be less if you gave the less populated areas of NM 575. The idea that I might have to call my next door neighber or my mother down the street w/a 1 505 or 1 575 is crazy. AREA code is just that -- The code for the geographic AREA. Thank you.
From: Jane Howard
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I prefer a geographic split.
From: Susan H. Margison
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Having just moved here from a county in New York State where we went through the same situation about two years ago, I wish to state my preference for implementation of the "Geographic Split Option". As this is a situation where some inconvenience is going to have to be experienced by some of New Mexico's citizenry, it seems that the "Geographic Split Option" will cause less expense and inconvenience to far fewer individuals, organizations, and businesses than the alternative "Overlay" option.
From: Henry Ingalls
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Like everyone else, I would prefer to not change my area code.
However, I would greatly prefer to change my area code and only dial 7
digits for nearly all my calls than to keep my area code and have to dial
10 digits for all my calls.
Therefore, I am strongly in favor of the geographic split option.
The geographic split option seems to be the overwhelming preference of
those submitting comments on the website. Perhaps those favoring
the overlay: (1) don't realize that only the area code changes and the
way they make or receive local calls will not change; or (2) they have
some personal economic preference, probably very short term, for the overlay.
Several commentors have said that we will be forced into 10 digit calling
eventually anyway so we might as well do it now. If that is the
case, the PRC should take a very long-term view of the situation and divide
the state into as many geographical regions as necessary to accomodate
growth for an extended time, perhaps 50 or more years. If that results
in 3 or 4 or 5 or more area codes, so what. More people would have
to change now, but it is better to only have to change once.
I would suggest making the geographic splits based on the anticipated
volume of phone numbers required at some date as far in the future as
can be reasonably predicted, perhaps 5 or 10 or more years. Then
look at the current volume of phone numbers in those geographic regions,
and let the region with the most current numbers keep 505 and everybody
would have to change. This would result is the region keeping 505
that would have the greatest cost of change.
From: Candace Brower
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Having experienced the overlay system in the Chicago area, I strongly urge the geographic split. Being able to tell what area a phone call is coming from is very helpful. And reprogramming all cell phones to include the area code would be a pain in the neck. The only downside to the split would be the very temporary one of redoing business cards and the such, which has to be done periodically anyway. Given enough lead time, businesses should be able to adjust at fairly minimal cost. As for which area should keep the 505 number, I slightly favor Albuquerque, since it is the main metropolitan area. (That was the approach taken in Chicago before they switched to the overlay system.)
From: Deaun
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I strongly believe that Abq & SF should keep 505, the state & the majority of businesses would spend entirely too much money to change all letter head, cards, etc......
From: Wayne
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
My vote is for the Geographic Split. I don't think most people would want to dial 10 digits for local calls. I know I don't.
From: Ted Gaudette
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Please keep Albquerque/Santa Fe 505. Changing it would affect a far greater number of people and businesses.
From: M.C. Domandi
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
First idea: why don't you change all cell phones to 575 and keep all
land lines 505. That would be neat and clean, if the numbers work.
Second idea: if for some reason that won't work, then go for the geographic
split. Make the largest cities 575, and leave everyone else at 505.
Thanks for soliciting our comments.
From: Jim Bryden
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I choose geographic split over overlay, and it should be Albuquerque that gets to keep 505 (reason: business center of state). Having to dial 10 digits due to overlay is a HUGE city problem that we shouldn't have to deal with here.
From: Sabra Basler
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I support keeping 505 in the major urban area, as the cost to businesses
would be a waste of money.
Make cell phones 575 land lines 505
From: Jerome Hall
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I live in Albuquerque. I have a home phone, a cell phone, and an office
phone.
Please just split the state into two area codes; I'd prefer to keep 505
in ABQ-SF, but I could survive if we got the 575.
But the overlay system would be a real nuisance with the 10-digit dialing.
From: Tom Anderson
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Cell phones and mobile devices are the problem as more and more people use them. There are enough 505 numbers for all the land based phones in the state. Since cell phones are causing the problem, let all cell phones or mobile phones use 575 and leave 505 for land phones. This way you would know if you were calling a land based phone or a cell phone by the area code you call.
From: Melvin L. Johnson
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I believe that area code 505 should be retained for the Albuquerque and Santa Fe areas as well as the rest of the northwest part of New Mexico as shown on your area A and area B map and the rest of the state should have the 575 area code. This is the only solution that makes sense if you consider that there would be less confusion for the public and less cost to most of the New Mexico businesses.
From: Glen Kraft
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Give us the geographic split. I don't care which area code number we get as long as we don't have to dial 11 numbers to call across the street.
From: Ted Church
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
There does not seem to be justification for a 10 digit dialing requirement
for all New Mexico phones.
The geographic division is the best option with area code 505 retained
in the northern Rio Grande Valley and nearby environs.
From: norma
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I am in favor of the geographic split with ABQ/SF area keeping th 505 area code.
From: Linda
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
The major metro area, ABQ/SF should keep area code 505. I'm in favor of the geographic split.
From: Debbie Mitchell
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Make the 575 a geographic split, with the Albuquerque/Santa Fe area keeping 505 and the rest of the state 575.
From: Mandira Feldvebel
Date: August 15, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Thank you very much for taking feedback on the proposed addition of a
new area code for New Mexico.
Having been through a couple of area code switches in the past in other
states, I would like to offer my preference.
My preference would be to leave Albuquerque and Santa Fe and points in
between with the 505 area code and to give the new area code to outlying
areas which are less populous.
Under this scenario, all points in the state outside of the ABQ - S-FE
corridor would be in the new area code: Las Cruces, Taos, and every other
area in a big donut!
This way, the largest proportion of the population wouldn't have to switch,
which seems like it would save a lot of trouble.
Also, the idea of having to dial 10 digits for every call leaves me absolutely
cold. Please don't do an overlay.
Thank you.
From: Karen D. Vance
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF ANY OVERLAY PROGRAM FOR AREA CODES.
NO WAY TO THE OVERLAY
From: H Tran
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I prefer a geographic split, with Albuquerque/Santa Fe in (505) and Eastern
NM in (575).
Second choice is an overlay plan.
From: joe slagle
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
The Geographic split is the only logical solution. The overlay makes absolutely no sense.
From: Patricia French
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I say NO to the overlay and yes to the geographic split option for the area code change. Who wants to dial 10 digits for a local number.
From: Martha Whitman
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I am an Albuquerque resident and business owner, and I ask the PRC to adopt the geographic split option. It is the right thing to do.
From: Suzan Wood
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I feel the best option is the geographic split. The overlay option is too confusing and will continue to cause confusion after implemented.
From: David Lowe
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
No matter how you proceed problems will be caused to some. Shorterm, overlay sounds like the best solution but not well thought out for the future. 2 ditricts with different area codes should be formed. Since more government is located in the valley sector this should stay the same to avoid major tax payer expense.
From: Martin Zimbeoff
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Keep Albuquerque as 505
From: Marcia Brooks
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Please vote for the geographic split option and NOT the overlay option on the NM area code relief issue.
From: Jim Mize
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I am against the Overlay plan and favor the Geographic Split. I have two cell phones, two telephone lines of which one is used for a high speed internet connection and a fax, and an alarm system, all of which would have to be reprogrammed under the Overlay plan. This would involve considerable effort and costs. NO WAY to Overlay!
From: Marlene Chase
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments: It's bad enough to add another area code. The geographic split
seems to make
more sense than the overlay which should
NOT be an option.
From: Mary Lee Moeny
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Overlay plan - NO!!
From: Henry L Bretton
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
As Seniors my wife (81 yrs) and I (90yrs)are strongly opposed to the proposed "overlay." We favor the Geographic Split as we will find the burden of conversion of all of our papers, checkbooks, trusts, etc etc simply too much. Respectfully H.L.Bretton and Marian M Bretton
From: Jacqui Cross
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I believe it would be in the best interest of everyone in New Mexico to adopt the geographic split option. We are all going to have to come into the 21st century and accept a change of some sort. Let's just bite the bullet and get it over with. Using the over lay option is way too complicated and confusing.
From: Kent Mathis
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
New Mexico should NOT institute the overlay system for the new area code. A geographic split makes far more sense in the daily lives of all New Mexicans, in terms of cost, convenience, and numbers of citizens affected. Please use some common sense in making this decision. NO WAY TO THE OVERLAY!!!!!
From: Kara Gillon
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I strongly recommend that New Mexico and the PRC follow the lead of other
states and adopt the geographical split option of 505/575. This
option simply makes more sense for those calling from out-of-state and
are confused by two area codes for the entire state, regardless of location;
for those in-state who could have different area codes in the same home
or business; and for two-thirds of those in-state who will have less work
because of this decision.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
From: C. Earl Greer
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I understand there are approximately 7 million numbers available in an
area code and that we are only using in the neighborhood of 2 million.
1) Are my figures correct?
2) If so, why are we looking at adding a new area code; it is a costly
agenda!
3) If my figures are not correct, what are the correct figures? Why have
they not been shared with the general public? If they have, why do you
suppose the media has not forwarded the data to the public?
4) I have not seen where a study has been done to determine the impact
cell phones have had on the area code issue. What is that impact?
5) Why are you "rushing" this issue through? Why not wait until
2007 when there will be 3 newly elected commissioners?
Please advise.
Thank you for your attention to my comments.
From: Bert U. Eriksson
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Geographical Split Option is the least confusing
So......
I ABSOLUTELY DO NOT WANT THE OVERLAY OPTION FOR THE NEW 575 AREA CODE.
Another Option is Cell Phones Area 575
The rest 505
From: Paul Brooks
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Assign area code 575 to cell phones and area code 505 to land lines.
From: Jim Maddox
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Whith all the cell phones in use why are celll phone area codes not being considered as the change instead of business and residential and splitting the state? Seriously this should be looked at in more detail! Much less costly for the consumer.
From: Bob
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Why not use 575 for cell phones and leave the land based phones as they are?
From: Cindy Rondeau
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
The overlay option is a bad idea. Bad for children who need to contact
their parents and the elderly who need to contact family.
The Geographic split option makes much more sense! As Albuquerque
metro grows it is only reasonable to add more area codes to the state.
But not to place a burden on all who live in the state!
From: Jon Arndt
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I favor the overlay option. Although dialing a 10 digit number for all calls is tedious, I believe it is superior to forcing some business and consumers to change phone numbers.
From: Bertha Baca
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I think that all cell phone numbers should be issued the new 575 and all land lines should keep the 505.
From: Susan H
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I believe we need the geographic split. Having to dial an area code for someone across the street would be ridiculous. The area that retains the 505 code should be the area with the highest concentration of businesses that use letterhead stationery and business cards and other printed materials that would be expensive to replace. That would reduce the overall economic burden on the state as a whole.
From: Stephanie
Date: August 14, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
why can't they just say after such-n-such a date, all new issued numbers will have the new area code?
From: Robert Potts
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
The best solution is not the one being offered. Make all land lines
505 and all cell phones 575. The reason we need another area code
in this state is because of the explosion of cell phone use. So,
make the culprit bear the onus of change!
It's also very practical in that statewide almost everyone who has a legitamite
need to keep 505 will be able to keep it. And you will always know
whether you are dialing a cell or a land line in NM.
If you do the math you will see that this solution allows plenty of numbers
for cell phones in 575 area code, and plenty of numbers for land lines
in 505 area code.
Problem solved!
Only problem, no one has ever done it this way in the US.
Let's try a little innovation for once!
From: Dennis C. Wilson
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I have reviewed the two options and feel that the overlay option is not acceptable! The only way (I feel) to implement this plan is to implement the GEOGRAPHIC SPLIT OPTION. Additionally, I am not very pleased that you have made it so hard for people to get their comments heard.
From: Tom Heilpern
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
The city and surrouding are of Portland Ore has about 1.7 million people
in one area code. There is no talk of sub-dividing that code
number.
Quest is not giving the PRC the honest answers to your questions.
Is it the first time?
From: Janet Simon
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
The geopgraphic split option has far fewer negatives than the Overlay option. I encourage the PRC to decide in favor of the geographic split option.
From: Barbara Weissenborn
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
My husband, Ron, and I are against the Overlay option and FOR the Geographic Split option regarding the new area code, 575. Please consider our comments when voting on the area code relief. Also, the neighbors I have spoken with feel the same.
From: River of Life Foursquare Gospel Church
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
We are against the Overlay Option in the NM area code relief issue
From: Willie & Lori Sisneros
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Please vote NO to the Overlay Option on the NM Area Code Relief Issue. There are too many disadvantages to the overlay Option. The Geographic Split Option is much better & less confusing. SAY NO WAY TO THE OVERLAY!!!!
From: Rudy & Gina Sisneros
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Please vote NO to the Overlay Option on the NM Area Code
Relief Issue. We say "NO WAY" to the Overlay!! It is just too
confusing. The Geographic Split Option makes better sense. Thanks
From: Amalie Frischknecht
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I would much prefer the geographic split option to the 575 area code, even if it meant I had to change my own area code (I live in Albuquerque). It would be a real nuisance and confusion to have different area codes in the same geographic area.
From: Robert Harris
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Please note I am against using the overlay system here in NM. Please make it easier on all of us and split the state into to two seperate area codes. I don't care if Rio Rancho keeps the old area code or gets a new one. Just do not use the overlay approach.
From: David
Date: August 13, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I prefer the geographic split option
From: simon doering
Date: August 12, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I think we should change it only if we have too. Are we running out of numbers? If not, we're kinda known as the "505", why mess with it.
From: ervin
Date: August 12, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
keep major populated areas with the 505 and the rest of the state gets new. Just like Arizona, Colorado, Utah, Idaho, Washington, etc. Use what has worked, no need to reinvent the wheel.
From: Ruth Milner
Date: August 12, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Please stick with the normal geographic split. It's a clear-cut division,
easy for everyone calling NM numbers to figure out, and a simple one-time
conversion for those who have to. My former employer went through it with
two of their four locations in the past 15 years; this would be the third.
There's a lengthy period when calls are redirected if the old area code
is used. It just isn't a big deal, for businesses or anyone else.
The overlay option, by contrast, would result in far more confusion for
all concerned, and that confusion would last indefinitely. "Yes,
my business had to add a second line, but it's 575 even though our original
number is 505." What a nightmare, for years to come.
I don't understand why this has generated so much agonizing. It's been
done before; is New Mexico really going to be the first place where people
can't handle this? How silly.
Oh, and for the record, I live in a town that would have to change its
area code if 505 stays with ABQ and/or Santa Fe.
From: K. Moran
Date: August 12, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I am of the opinion that new phone numbers should receive the 575 area
code. Such a course of action avoids the problem of dividing the
state and figuring out on whom to place the burden and cost of changing
all information that includes the current 505 area code.
Having lived in Los Angeles for 12 years where ten digit dialing was a
fact of life to call only a few miles away, this burden is relatively
minor, especially when so many people use/keep cell phones with area codes
other than 505. We are already dialing 10 digits for lots of calls.
From: Kay McGhee
Date: August 12, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I am adamantly opposed to the overlay option for the new area code in NM. I believe the geographic split would be the most efficient, reasonable and financially prudent for the citizens of this State. The majority of other states having this option have chosen the geographic split. The geographic split is favored by the majority of NM citizens. Please do what is right by the people of NM!
From: Kathleen V. Ward
Date: August 11, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
No way to the overlay
From: Jerry E. Zimmerman
Date: August 11, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
No way to the overlay bad idea..
From: Debbie Winchell
Date: August 11, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
No Way to the Overlay!!!!!! The geographic split makes a lot more sense.
From: Kim Slagle
Date: August 11, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
The Geographic Split Option is the COMMON SENSE option. The Overlay Option would be very confusing and expensive for all New Mexicans and have a negative impact on ecomonic development. Please vote for the GEOGRAPHIC SPLIT OPTION. Thank you.
From: Jarrod Cline
Date: August 11, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I would prefer the geographic split option.
From: James Messec
Date: August 11, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Both as a private citizen and as a small business owner I strongly object to the Overlay concept. I much prefer the geographic concept. EVEN IF IT MEANS MY BUSINESS AND RESIDENCE WIND UP IN THE NEW AREA CODE.
From: Bill Harris and Cindy Chapman
Date: August 10, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
We prefer the geographic split option because all New Mexicans would be able to make a normal 7 digit local call. Only half the citizens of NM would have an area code change. It would be simple to remembeer that all local calls are the same as before. Very little or no reprogramming of cell phones, home phones, fax machnes, and business phone systems would be required. Very few fire and burglary alarm panels or other dialing systems would have to be reprogrammed.
From: Abe
Date: August 10, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I am in favor of a geographic split, not the overlay proposal. If 575 could be given to phone numbers statewide, how would we know if we are calling a long-distance phone number? We would have no idea if a phone number is our next-door neighbor or across the state.
From: Teresa Maestas
Date: August 10, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I would like to express my support for the geographic split option. Thank you for your consideration.
From: James W. Busse
Date: August 10, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I vote for the geographical division. The idea that one would need to dial 10 numbers to call within your community is adding undue difficulty to all. No overlay please!
From: Ross and Lee Ann Roberts
Date: August 10, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
We live in Albuquerque and support the option in which Albuquerque and parts of northern New Mexico would keep the 505 area code, and the rest of the state would switch to 575. Thank you.
From: Kyle
Date: August 10, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
GEOGRAPHICAL SPLIT! The Overlay Option will HURT growing businesses. VOTE AGAINST the OVERLAY option.
From: ROBERT WEINBERG
Date: August 10, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
PLEASE DO NOT INSTTUTE THE OVERLAY OPTION WHEN YOU ADD THE NEW AREA CODE. I HAVE SPENT CONSIDERABLE TIME IN MARYLAND WHERE THIS IS HOW PHONE CALLS ARE HANDLED. IN A RELATIVELY RURAL AREA LIKE NEW MEXICO, IT JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO HAVE TO DIAL 10 DIGITS TO MAKE ANY & ALL PHONE CALLS! PLEASE SPLIT THE AREA GEOGRAHICALLY MAKING IT EASIER ON EVERYONE...THANKS FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.
From: Anita Justu
Date: August 10, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
SPLIT THE STATE -- PLEASE !!!!!!!!!!!!
We have to realize that this is a forever decision. One proposal I have
heard mentioned is giving 575 to new numbers or cell phones, this will
cause a lot of wrong numbers being dialed from here to eternity(from people
forgeting or not dialing 575), and we are going to be dailing 11 numbers
all the time since we call cell phones constantly. None of the choices
are great, but, I am sure that none of us really want to dial 11 numbers
forever. If we all suffer with the split of the state now, it will be
a temporary situation. All of the other choices are permanent, we will
live with it daily, and we will all be cursing the decision years and
years from now. Keep in mind the possibility that any choice other than
a SPLIT could be such a disaster that, in the future, the state
of NM will have to reverse the decision and change to the split state
anyway.
From: Kenneth Cooper
Date: August 10, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Seriously consider this alternative:
. 575 to cell phones
. 505 to hard wired phones
Comment for those wishing to provide 575 area codes to all new users:
. It's easy to find out an out of state area code, just Google,
"area code map".
. Imagine in the future someone from elsewhere Googling, "area
code map - New Mexico". I can imagine the map comment, "First
try 505, if that doesn't work, 575 should do the trick.
From: MARIE LUCERO
Date: August 10, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I AM IN FAVOR OF THE GEOGRAPHIC SPLIT OPTION, THE OVERLAY OPTION SOUNDS LIKE A BAD IDEA!
From: Roger L. Brown
Date: August 9, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
The Overlay option is a bad idea. We had that back in MD and it
was very difficult. Everyone throughout NM would have to dial 10
digit phone numbers. Geographic Split Option makes sence to me.
Please support the Geographic Split option. Thank you.
From: Valerie Hislip
Date: August 9, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Please do not go with the Overlay option! The Geographic Split option makes much more sense and would cause far fewer problems. Dialing a 10-digit number every time doesn't make much sense. In addition, I'm concerned about the problems and costs inherent to reprogramming my burglary alarm monitoring system if the Overlay option is chosen. Consider this a vote for the Geographic Split option!
From: Lori Peterkin
Date: August 9, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
No way to Overlay!
Choose Geographic Split
From: Lee Carmody
Date: August 9, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
To whom it may concern,
Please add my name to the group that is in favor of the geographic split
option.
From: Kerry Wilson
Date: August 9, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I see the PRC is in DEE DEE DEE mode as usual. Whatkind of brain dead fools would even consider the "overlay" (code word for screw everyone except Qwest)? Why the PRC (Permanently Retarded Clowns)of course! No wonder this state is at the bottom of the "good" lists and at the top of the "bad" ones.
From: Norma
Date: August 9, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Cell phone access could be handled under the 575 area code. If someone had phone number with a 575 area code they would know it is a cell phone. Cell phones are easy to input contacts so it should be less of a hassle to make cell phones 575 and the rest of the state 505.
From: Rohanna Muth
Date: August 9, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Please, let's use the Geographic Split Option.
Thank you.
From: Daniel Muth
Date: August 9, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
My vote is for the GEOGRAPHIC SPLIT OPTION.
From: Jan Loving
Date: August 9, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Please do a geographic split when the new area codes go into effect.
To dial 10 numbers for every call would bew an amazing waste of time.
From: Erica Madrid
Date: August 9, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I think we should most definitely go with the geographic change so we don't have to dial 10 digits every time we dial or so we don't have to go around trying to figure out who has which area code. I don't mind the change and 575 is close enough to 505 that it shouldn't cause too much chaos, but making the whole state both area codes with each neighbor having different numbers if FAR TOO COMPLICATED!!
From: C Pierce
Date: August 9, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I vote for the Geographic Split Option, preferably with the 575 in the Albuquerque and Santa Fe areas. The phone company can put a recording for the area code change stating, the area code 505 has been change to 575 for the Albuquerque area and Santa Fe area, as it does when a phone# has been changed.
From: Rae Champagne
Date: August 9, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Since most NM citizens and most states favor a "Geographic Split" vs. the PRC's "overlay" option in determining needs and usage of a new area code, it seems that the Regulatory Commissioners are more interested in saving money for businesses than for their constituents, the people living in one of the poorest states. Shame on you.
From: Robert Havlen
Date: August 9, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I am NOT in favor of the overlay method of adding a new area code in
NM.
The advantages of the geographic split that I have seen listed are very
obvious and it is clear why most other states have chosen geographic split
when faced with an expanding population base. That is literally
why the geographic split was chosen when the area code system was set
up nationally in the first place many years ago. The majority of
states have contained geographic splits
from the outset for their large populations and it is very common to have
urban areas with area codes that are different than the regions around
them. NM has had the luxury of having only one area code (505) but
now it should step up to the modern world and follow the model of its
more populous neighboring states.
There is one advantage of the geographic split that does not just effect
the residents of NM (and one that I have not heard stated previously).
For a caller into NM from out of state it is much easier to remember (and
use) the specific NM area codes when they are contacting multiple NM residents
by simply knowing their general geographic locations. I speak from
experience while calling from NM to other regions of the country which
have multiple codes. Also, when you see someone's phone number you
have a good idea of what part of the state they live in and just where
you are calling within the state. For example, in the past all of
our out of state callers knew that 505 meant NM. In the future they
will be able to identify 505 with a specific part of NM (ABQ, for instance)
and to identify 575 with another part of the state. This is valuable
information that we should encourage in order to expedite correct future
calling (from memory or from limited address information).
From: A-TECH Security, Inc.
Date: August 9, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I want A-TECH Security, Inc. on record as supporting the GEOGRAPHIC SPLIT
OPTION.
We favor this option becuase of the financial hardship on our comapny
as well as all Alarm & Telephone Companies who would have to re-program
thousands of Alarm & Phone systems to dial a 10-digit number.
I also would like the PRC to consider a third area code number now so
as to avoid this problem in 20-30 years from now. Split the state into
3-parts, Northern, Central & Southern New Mexico with three distinct
area codes.
Thank you for listening and accepting our comments.
From: Laverne Molina/NM Gynecology Consultants, P.C.
Date: August 9, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
NO WAY TO THE OVERLAY!!! THERE ARE MORE ADVANTAGES TO THE GEOGRAPHIC SPLIT OPTION
From: Timmerman, Betty L
Date: August 9, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
NO WAY to the overlay.
From: Vernon A Pape Sr.
Date: August 9, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Why not leave the 505 area code W/the citiesthat have the most Fed & State offices,ie Albu,SF,Alamo,White Sands,Los Alamo and any Air Bases,thus costing less on reprinting ALL Forms that will have to be changed. As tax payer looks like to me a "no brainer".Give the 505 to the Northern part of the state and change the South to 575. Let Albuq win if this a contest-who cares?
From: Marion Moll
Date: August 9, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
We recently moved here from Connecticut which experienced a similar situation about 20 years ago. There the state was split into two area codes 203, the old area code, and 860, the new area code, rather than use the "overlay" method. This worked extrememly well and while there was some complaining from those that wanted to retain the more "prestigous" 203 area code, there frankly was little disruption or inconvenience. I would therefore recommend NOT going to the overly system, but split the state.
From: Paul Benia
Date: August 9, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Welcome 575! To many who opposed it, it was about remaining small and resisting growth. Let our state grow and catch up to others around us! A second area code is a sign NM is a progressing state!!
From: Sammie Hutchison
Date: August 8, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I feel the overlay plan will be too costly (changing stationery), time consuming (dialing extra digits/remembering which prefix) and confusing (same business/person having multiple prefixes). Please choose the geographic split.
From: Debbie and Andy Rogulich
Date: August 8, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Please choose the Geographic Split option. It think it makes the most sense. It may be incovenient to have to change our area code, but this will be a short time inconvenience. If we have do go with the overlay option it will be a bother all of the time, every single day for the rest of our lives. I teach preschool children and they need to learn the important phone numbers in their lives. It is enough for them to remember 7 numbers, and unnecessary for them to learn 10 numbers. The think what confusion it would be (and beyond their understanding) to know that some of the numbers start with 505 and others start with 575 and they might get them mixed up, resutling in them not know the numbers they need to know. Please make it easier for the people in New Mexico even if it cost the phone companies more money. We sure pay enough on our phone bills every single month to cover the cost of this!! Thank you.
From: Sally Clement
Date: August 8, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I believe that the geographic split is the best option. Everyone will understand which area code goes where after the initial confusion. I cant imagine calling my neighbor next door on 575 and the one across the street on 505. Nor would I like to have my 2nd phone in the house on a different area code. Too confusing.
From: Katherine Roehl
Date: August 8, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I vote for the geographic split option rather than the overlay option because the overlay option will cause undue stress to all NM residents and will cost more money in long distance charges, confusion, etc. So, please go with the geographic split option instead!
From: Linda Hight
Date: August 8, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
NO WAY TO THE OVERLAY!
I absolutely favor the geographic split option.
From: Brian Moore
Date: August 8, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
Dear Sirs,
It Seems to me that there would be less economic impact on the overall
people of the state of New Mexico if we go with the geographic split option.
So it has my vote.
From: Kathy Medina
Date: August 8, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I would hope that existing business and homes would be allowed to retain the 505 area code. It would cost businesses, especially, quite a bit to change advertising, phone book information, business cards, invoices, statements and other business related items.
From: Paul Sweenhart
Date: August 8, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I vote for the Geographic Split Option. The overlay option makes no sense.
From: Kay
Date: August 8, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
I believe it would be much more efficient to use the geographic split method to implement the new 575 area code. It would be much less confusing to keep all the 505 area codes in Albuquerque and Santa Fe rather than have a mixture. It would be easier to manage in the future, and we would not have to dial a 10 digit number in the local area. Also, businesses could maintain the 505 area code should they need to add another phone line in the future. Mixing area codes in the same city and surrounding area eventually will become a nightmare, and will be very confusing to long distance callers as evidenced in other states and cities.
From: Teresa Nachman
Date: August 8, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
The proposed geographical split would be the best for the New Mexico economy, and the areas with the largest number of businesses, such as Bernalillo County and Santa Fe County. I would suggest that you not divide a county with two different area codes.
From: Karen & Timothy Long
Date: August 8, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
We both VOTE FOR THE GEOGRAPHIC SPLIT OPTION. It is the only option that makes practical sense.
From: Robert Cates
Date: August 8, 2006
Subject: 575 Area Code Relief
Comments:
The proposed map to split the regions is chaotic. Users want to
know the likely area code of an area without having to look at a map every
time you make a call. The split should be split along county lines
to reduce confusion and frustration with the system.
Perhaps the split should follow the same split the state has for zip codes:
87xxx in one area code and 88xxx in the other.